|
Post by Ezeem, the Second Thirsty on May 10, 2019 4:46:58 GMT
I know a guy who can incorporate anything we want in the British virgin islands with a phony board of directors and we can do whatever banking we want tax free
|
|
|
Post by Rexx14 on May 10, 2019 5:00:53 GMT
OK. that is also kinda in agreement with OP here. What about I nominate: kre8tive, rexx, whosnext, kerowo, curse, myself, Louis Cyphre, and also whoelse thinks that what is going on right now is kinda frustrating and it would be a cool idea to answer the question What are we? and have some kind of legal incorporation. (edit: you all can clearly decline. I sooooo get it. That is sooo out of hand) I am not such a saint like greg is. He absolutely deserves some kind of badge or so for digging through all that here. Here is my suggestion for the work plan: 1. I am so not gonna read any posts longer than 10 lines and any sentences longer than three lines. Plain because I believe that any thought can be put in this format, no matter how complicated. And hell, we all have a job and that whole business is supposed to increase our quality of life and not to frustrate the shit of everyone. 2. I have for now two variants in my head for legal incorporation: coop and non-profit. I have a rough idea how to set-up both. I am very open for any other ideas of incorporation. 3. I think that we need a public poll with options to this And I would try as hard as possible to increase the voting participation and to encourage people to make an informed decision, but whoever votes then is the quorum 4 I suggest to plain take a set of bylaws from the internet to whatever form will be chosen and adjust them a little bit for our needs. There are a lot of examples.
5. Then we will again try to get an approval for the bylaws from general population with the same procedure like in 3. 6. We will have a lawyer if necessary, a paid one, to look over the bylaws and to register the entity with authorities.
That's it.
Could somebody give cliffs regarding the last part of this post? I stopped reading after line 10. Non-profit is going to be a heap more work/hasslewhich I'm doubtful anyone here wants to do, I certainly don't. Cooperative is the way to go imo. I accept the nomination to participate in the caucus.
|
|
|
Post by lapka on May 10, 2019 6:26:51 GMT
OK. The point is that I think that the final decision should be put out in the general forum there. For that we have to create an OP for the voting in general forum, where we can more or less on point present the important differences between non-profit and coop. My spontaneous feeling was non-profit. But like I said the more I am reading the more I am for coop. I will try to put together one draft of the OP till the end of this Sunday in Germany. Anything you can contribute, any discussion on the topic any fleshing out, any, may be draft of an OP, or something helps. I will start to really work in it only tomorrow morning. Any sentence you write on that, any doubts you have (kerowo?) any controversial stuff... helps me here. kerowo how is your feeling now? still rather non-profit? Or slightly changing? If someone is bored out of his/her mind and doesn't know what to do, you can start to look for a good draft of bylaws on the internet.
|
|
|
Post by lapka on May 10, 2019 6:32:17 GMT
I know a guy who can incorporate anything we want in the British virgin islands with a phony board of directors and we can do whatever banking we want tax free God, ..... I need *heart* as a smiley.
Because SA opens with that another topic that we have to at least get a tiny idea: Incorporation is different from state to state. I have for now no clue and don't even know where to start to look where we want to be incorporated.
If someone wants to do a little research on that topic and present it here. Go!
I mean, obviously we will need a lawyer. But we need to do some pre-work.
|
|
|
Post by lapka on May 10, 2019 6:33:43 GMT
OK. that is also kinda in agreement with OP here. What about I nominate: kre8tive, rexx, whosnext, kerowo, curse, myself, Louis Cyphre, and also whoelse thinks that what is going on right now is kinda frustrating and it would be a cool idea to answer the question What are we? and have some kind of legal incorporation. (edit: you all can clearly decline. I sooooo get it. That is sooo out of hand) I am not such a saint like greg is. He absolutely deserves some kind of badge or so for digging through all that here. Here is my suggestion for the work plan: 1. I am so not gonna read any posts longer than 10 lines and any sentences longer than three lines. Plain because I believe that any thought can be put in this format, no matter how complicated. And hell, we all have a job and that whole business is supposed to increase our quality of life and not to frustrate the shit of everyone. 2. I have for now two variants in my head for legal incorporation: coop and non-profit. I have a rough idea how to set-up both. I am very open for any other ideas of incorporation. 3. I think that we need a public poll with options to this And I would try as hard as possible to increase the voting participation and to encourage people to make an informed decision, but whoever votes then is the quorum 4 I suggest to plain take a set of bylaws from the internet to whatever form will be chosen and adjust them a little bit for our needs. There are a lot of examples.
5. Then we will again try to get an approval for the bylaws from general population with the same procedure like in 3. 6. We will have a lawyer if necessary, a paid one, to look over the bylaws and to register the entity with authorities.
That's it.
Could somebody give cliffs regarding the last part of this post? I stopped reading after line 10. Completely correct decision. Nothing after line 10 matters. Non-profit is going to be a heap more work/hasslewhich I'm doubtful anyone here wants to do, I certainly don't. Cooperative is the way to go imo. I accept the nomination to participate in the caucus. *thumbs*
Any more fleshing out on why the coop is The Thing? Why non-profit is more hussle?
|
|
|
Post by lapka on May 10, 2019 6:49:37 GMT
Run a politics focused forum as a steppingstone to hosting additional content which we hope to be successful enough to be able to donate money to causes and candidates important to the community. Tx for clear summary of what was flying in the air. I think we need to have a talk on that.
I had once a vision for OOT: cool people doing cool stuff!
In how you formulated it, the focus is somehow on donating money to causes. I find it boring. And Politics is also boring. More like "Run a politics and general life stuff focused forum for smart people to make cool ideas come alive"?
We need somehow incorporate in that as much as possible of the vision you have for this place. So I would ask here everyone who reads that to think for a moment: "What do you actually hope to get from here?". For example I have heard things like: entertainment, silly stuff, life help, information ......but think bigger, think really about your Vision for here and post it here. I can imagine things like: power to change things in the society for the good, solution for problems on the personal level, fun....... We will then try to incorporate it in some kind of Mission statement.
I think at this place a contribution from commonWealth (admin) is absolutely necessary. Also anyone from the general forum, who finds his/her way here, please contribute: "What is your vision for this place? "
|
|
|
Post by kerowo on May 10, 2019 13:47:06 GMT
My opinion on legal stuff, like how we incorporate, is going to be we ask a lawyer to weigh in rather than vote based on our google-foo.
22 started as a poker board and grew into a general-purpose board. We literally started this place to replace the politics board. I’m not really going to worry about who we give money to until there is more money earned from advertising than is required to run the board. That vision statement or whatever you called it was the major points that came up in other threads, it isn’t made up from my imagination.
|
|
|
Post by lapka on May 10, 2019 14:33:19 GMT
My opinion on legal stuff, like how we incorporate, is going to be we ask a lawyer to weigh in rather than vote based on our google-foo. 22 started as a poker board and grew into a general-purpose board. We literally started this place to replace the politics board. I’m not really going to worry about who we give money to until there is more money earned from advertising than is required to run the board. That vision statement or whatever you called it was the major points that came up in other threads, it isn’t made up from my imagination. I completely agree with a lawyer. But even to a lawyer you need to go with something. Preferably with decision if coop or non-profit, bylaws and incorporation articles.
Or I will rather say it so: I am sure that we can find a lawyer who decides for us, on what we will become, and could write for us everything, but I am also pretty sure that on the free market it will cost a lot more than we got together with donations. (I am totally fine if you convince me from opposite). We could ask between lawbros here, if anyone is willing to give us a hand, I am all for that. If you see any other alternative on how we can get a lawyer to weigh-in on that, I am all ear.
I am absolutely for a lawyer in all this.
I know that this statement/intention sentence was a summary from other threads. I didn't think that it was your imagination. But what is your imagination? What do you want for future here?
|
|
|
Post by lapka on May 10, 2019 14:40:01 GMT
I digged a little bit more and I think I found a complete killer argument for coop and against non-profit. Basically to keep a tax exemption status you have to follow pretty restrictive rules as a 501 c 3 non-profit. In this rules are:
So.... I would say the question remaining is: Do we still put it out for general voting or do we just decide that we become a coop? I am fine with both things.
I will with the next post post here a possible OP for general voting and will urge people in ATF and "willing to help" money thread have a look here to get a better feel for what people think.
|
|
|
Post by lapka on May 10, 2019 14:44:55 GMT
OP draft for a voting poll non-profit versus coop.
Currently we have worked out two alternatives what we can become: non-profit and coop. Everyone who has worked on that is in consensus that coop is a better alternative. Nevertheless we think that everyone should have a voice in that. To simplify making of an informed decision for you here is very short summary of advantages and disadvantages of both structures: First thing I thought about, and I am sure many of you will, is the money. Non-profit sounds somehow more noble and coop sounds more greedy. However the main real difference is who decides what is happening and how many laws and restrictions do you have to obey. Non-profit has no owner and has to obey a lot of regulations, coop is owned by its members. With coop all decisions remains in your hand. You decide if you want to donate money you made and to whom. You completely can remain as noble as you want and distribute all extra money between support for AOC, some mental health foundation and a kitty home . With non-profit on the other hand you are extremely limited as well as with business you can do and with where you can donate money. Here are few rules you have to follow as a 501 (c)(3) non-profit organization to keep you tax benefits. Nonprofits are not allowed to urge their members to support or oppose legislation. They may participate in a small amount of lobbying, but lobbying activities may not exceed a certain amount of the organization’s total expenses. Political campaign activity. A nonprofit organization may not financially support or endorse any political candidates verbally or in writing. They may not oppose candidates either. This rule applies to candidates at every level — local, state and federal. Unrelated business income. Nonprofit organizations aren’t allowed to generate too much income from a purpose that is unrelated to the nonprofit. An organization that regularly operates a trade or business that is unrelated to the nonprofit and makes significant contributions to the organization would need to pay taxes. Basically just having this rules would exclude incorporation as 501 c3 non-profit for us. The only thing that a non-profit has as an advantage is that you can apply for some grants, what in itself is a full time job. Please ask questions, make remarks, especially if you are a lawyer. Try to make an informed decision.
|
|
|
Post by Rexx14 on May 10, 2019 23:35:15 GMT
Unless there's a specific reason, like we will receive tax deductible donations (yeah, profit companies can get donations, but non-profs elect to be non-profs to get donations) or a specific program we aim to take advantage of, it is more trouble to be a non-prof. I was a consultant doing grant writing for non-profits for 3 years and it's more complicated to be a non-profit. Being a non-profit was constraining on things they were able to do, even things that made a lot of sense and would save them a lot of money. And it opens us up to new liabilities as well if we fuck that up. Yeah non profit is more work, more complicated more management and more potential risks. What benefits for doing that offset those negatives? Could somebody give cliffs regarding the last part of this post? I stopped reading after line 10. Completely correct decision. Nothing after line 10 matters. Non-profit is going to be a heap more work/hasslewhich I'm doubtful anyone here wants to do, I certainly don't. Cooperative is the way to go imo. I accept the nomination to participate in the caucus. *thumbs*
Any more fleshing out on why the coop is The Thing? Why non-profit is more hussle?
Pretty much just what micro and marksman said. More chances of liabilities and just a heap more work. Being a cooperative is going to be much more flexible, less work and less likely to result in legal issues. Non-profit would be a pain in the butt imo.
|
|
|
Post by microbet on May 10, 2019 23:47:56 GMT
*thumbs*
Any more fleshing out on why the coop is The Thing? Why non-profit is more hussle?
A co-op is not more simple than if say one person owns the whole thing, but one person doesn't own the whole thing, right? We all own it. A cooperative is what we are. imo.
|
|
|
Post by lapka on May 11, 2019 9:59:50 GMT
hehe... I checked the approximate cost of incorporation. I mean... it is just to get a rough feeling: www.legalzoom.com/articles/what-are-the-general-costs-of-incorporating~500 for filing. That is like it looks like completely unavoidable. ~1000 Tax prepainment (probably can be avoided by choosing the state of incorporation and the lawyer wisely) ~between 500 and 5000 for a lawyer.
|
|
|
Post by microbet on May 11, 2019 16:41:07 GMT
hehe... I checked the approximate cost of incorporation. I mean... it is just to get a rough feeling: www.legalzoom.com/articles/what-are-the-general-costs-of-incorporating~500 for filing. That is like it looks like completely unavoidable. ~1000 Tax prepainment (probably can be avoided by choosing the state of incorporation and the lawyer wisely) ~between 500 and 5000 for a lawyer. All varies by state. In CA, where I've started 3 corporations, it's $800. There are probably 30 members who are lawyers. I'm hoping one or more of them will step up. From my experience lawyers are pretty loathe to get involved in something outside of their specialty, but even if we don't have anyone who has done stuff like this, it'd be helpful I think to have them on the group responsible. There are also a bunch of accountants and/or tax people.
|
|
|
Post by lapka on May 12, 2019 5:44:34 GMT
I am thinking what are the next steps..... I have decided for now not to put out for general voting, what should we become. I mean... I don't think that it is for now even a question any more and it is obvious that coop is a better solution. I think it is better to make a poll then already with a set of bylaws and incorporation articles.
I think that the next steps are to try to download a set of bylaws and incorporation articles for something more or less similar like we want here and to try to recruit a lawbro to support us in this. I am not sure when I will find time for that, since I got a demanding project in my job this week. But that is kinda the plan.
|
|
|
Post by lapka on May 12, 2019 8:53:05 GMT
|
|
|
Post by lapka on May 12, 2019 14:19:13 GMT
ARTICLE I
SHAREHOLDERS
Section 1. Annual Meeting. An annual meeting shall be held once each calendar year for the purpose of electing directors and for the transaction of such other business as may properly come before the meeting. The annual meeting shall be held at the time and place designated by the Board of Directors from time to time.
Section 2. Special Meetings. Special meetingsof the shareholders may be requested by the President, the Board of Directors, or the holders of a majority of the outstanding voting shares.
Section 3. Notice. Written notice of all shareholder meetings, whether regular or special meetings, shall be provided under this section or as otherwise required by law. The Notice shall state the place, date, and hour of meeting, and if for a special meeting, the purpose of the meeting. Such notice shall be mailed to all shareholders of record at the address shown on the corporate books, at least 10 days prior to the meeting. Such notice shall be deemed effective when deposited in ordinary U.S. mail, properly addressed, with postage prepaid.
Section 4. Place of Meeting.Shareholders` meetings shall be held at the corporation's principal place of business unless otherwise stated in the notice. Shareholders of any class or series may participate in any meeting of shareholders by means of remote communication to the extent the Board of Directors authorizes such participation for such class or series. Participation by means of remote communication shall be subject to such guidelines and procedures as the Board of Directors adopts. Shareholders participating in a shareholders' meeting by means of remote communication shall be deemed present and may vote at such a meeting if the corporation has implemented reasonable measures: (1) to verify that each person participating remotely is a shareholder, and (2) to provide such shareholders a reasonable opportunity to participate in the meeting and to vote on matters submitted to the shareholders, including an opportunity to communicate, and to read or hear the proceedings of the meeting, substantially concurrent with such proceedings.
Section 5. Quorum. A majority of theoutstanding voting shares, whether represented in person or by proxy, shall constitute a quorum at a shareholders` meeting. In the absence of a quorum, a majority of therepresented shares may adjourn the meeting to another time without further notice. If a quorum is represented at an adjourned meeting, any business may be transacted that might have been transacted at the meeting as originally scheduled. The shareholders present at a meeting represented by a quorum may continue to transact business until adjournment, even if the withdrawal of some shareholders results in representation of less than a quorum.
Section 6. Informal Action. Any action required to be taken, or which may be taken, at ashareholders meeting, may be taken without a meeting and without prior notice if a consent in writing, setting forth the action so taken, is signed by theshareholders who own all of the shares entitled to vote with respect to the subject matter of the vote.
ARTICLE II
DIRECTORS
Section 1. Number of Directors. The corporation shall be managed by a Board of Directors consisting of 0 director(s).
Section 2. Election and Term of Office. The directors shall be elected at the annualshareholders` meeting. Each director shall serve a term of year(s), or until a successor has been elected and qualified.
Section 3. Quorum. A majority of directors shall constitute a quorum.
Section 4. Adverse Interest. In the determination of a quorum of the directors, or in voting, the disclosed adverse interest of a director shall not disqualify the director or invalidate his or her vote.
Section 5. Regular Meeting. An annual meeting shall be held, without notice, immediately following and at the same place as the annual meeting of the shareholders. The Board of Directors may provide, by resolution, for additional regular meetings without notice other than the notice provided by the resolution.
Section 6. Special Meeting. Special meetings may be requested by the President, Vice-President, Secretary, or any two directors by providing five days' written notice by ordinary United States mail, effective when mailed. Minutes of the meeting shall be sent to the Board of Directors within two weeks after the meeting.
Section 7. Procedures. The vote of a majority of the directors present at a properly called meeting at which a quorum is present shall be the act of the Board of Directors, unless the vote of a greater number is required by law or by these by-laws for a particular resolution. A director of the corporation who is present at a meeting of the Board of Directors at which action on any corporate matter is taken shall be presumed to have assented to the action taken unless their dissent shall be entered in the minutes of the meeting. The Board shall keep written minutes of its proceedings in its permanent records.
If authorized by the governing body, any requirement of a written ballot shall be satisfied by a ballot submitted by electronic transmission, provided that any such electronic transmission must either set forth or be submitted with information from which it can be determined that the electronic transmission was authorized by the member or proxy holder.
Section 8. Informal Action. Any action required to be taken at a meeting of directors, or any action which may be taken at a meeting of directors or of a committee of directors, may be taken without a meeting if a consent in writing setting forth the action so taken, is signed by all of the directors or all of the members of the committee of directors, as the case may be.
Section 9. Removal / Vacancies. A director shall be subject to removal, with or without cause, at a meeting of the shareholders called for that purpose. Any vacancy that occurs on the Board of Directors, whether by death, resignation, removal or any other cause, may be filled by the remaining directors. A director elected to fill a vacancy shall serve the remaining term of his or her predecessor, or until a successor has been elected and qualified.
Section 10. Resignation. Any director may resign effective upon giving written notice to the chairperson of the board, the president, the secretary or the Board of Directors of the corporation, unless the notice specifies a later time for the effectiveness of such resignation. If the resignation is effective at a future time, a successor may be elected to take office when the resignation becomes effective.
Section 11. Committees. To the extent permitted by law, the Board of Directors may appoint from its members a committee or committees, temporary or permanent, and designate the duties, powers and authorities of such committees.
ARTICLE III
OFFICERS
Section 1. Number of Officers. The officers of the corporation shall be a President, a Treasurer, and a Secretary.
President/Chairman. The President shall be the chief executive officer and shall preside at all meetings of the Board of Directors and its Executive Committee, if such a committee is created by the Board.
Secretary. The Secretary shall give notice of all meetings of the Board of Directors and Executive Committee, if any, shall keep an accurate list of the directors, and shall have the authority to certify any records, or copies of records, as the official records of the corporation. The Secretary shall maintain the minutes of the Board of Directors' meetings and all committee meetings.
Treasurer/CFO. The Treasurer shall be responsible for conducting the financial affairs of the corporation as directed and authorized by the Board of Directors and Executive Committee, if any, and shall make reports of the corporation's finances as required, but no less often than at each meeting of the Board of Directors and Executive Committee.
Section 2. Election and Term of Office. The officers shall be elected annually by the Board of Directors at the first meeting of the Board of Directors, immediately following the annual meetingof the shareholders. Each officer shall serve a one year term or until a successor has been elected and qualified.
Section 3. Removal or Vacancy. The Board of Directors shall have the power to remove an officer or agent of the corporation. Any vacancy that occurs for any reason may be filled by the Board of Directors.
ARTICLE IV
CORPORATE SEAL, EXECUTION OF INSTRUMENTS
The corporation shall not have a corporate seal. All instruments that are executed on behalf of the corporation which are acknowledged and which affect an interest in real estate shall be executed by the President or any Vice-President and the Secretary or Treasurer. All other instruments executed by the corporation, including a release of mortgage or lien, may be executed by the President or any Vice-President. Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this section, any written instrument may be executed by any officer(s) or agent(s) that are specifically designated by resolution of the Board of Directors.
ARTICLE V
AMENDMENT TO BYLAWS
The bylaws may be amended, altered, or repealed by the Board of Directorsor the shareholders by a majorityof a quorum vote at any regular or special meeting; provided however, that the shareholders may from time to time specify particular provisions of the bylaws which shall not be amended or repealed by the Board of Directors.
ARTICLE VI
INDEMNIFICATION
Any director or officer who is involved in litigation by reason of his or her position as a director or officer of this corporation shall be indemnified and held harmless by the corporation to the fullest extent authorized by law as it now exists or may subsequently be amended (but, in the case of any such amendment, only to the extent that such amendment permits the corporation to provide broader indemnification rights).
ARTICLE VII
STOCK CERTIFICATES
The corporation may issue shares of the corporation's stock without certificates. Within a reasonable time after the issue or transfer of shares without certificates, the corporation shall send the shareholder a written statement of the information that is required by law to be on the certificates. Upon written request to the corporate secretary by a holder of such shares, the secretary shall provide a certificate in the form prescribed by the directors.
ARTICLE VIII
DISSOLUTION
The corporation may be dissolved only with authorization of its Board of Directors given at a special meeting called for that purpose, and with the subsequent approval by no less than two-thirds (2/3) vote of the members.
Certification
, Secretary of hereby certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the bylaws of the above-named corporation, duly adopted by the initial Board of Directors on .
_________________________________
, Secretary
|
|
|
Post by catfacemeowmers on May 13, 2019 16:15:51 GMT
So after reading some of the comments in another thread about 2p2's history of taking legal action against other websites, I think it makes sense to form a corporation ASAP with a temporary placeholder shareholder(s), even if that means going back and modifying the bylaws and shareholders a few months later. This is currently a project that has an almost zero net value, and we have a fairly small tight knit community. If over the course of the next several months, it becomes clear that whoever is delegated to be the shareholder is so overcome with greed and a lust for power that they refuse to issue additional shares or divy up their shares to other members, we can all just like ignore that person and re-incorporate with the plan and the people we want. There's not a lot of risk that I can see?
With that said, although I am an honorary lawbro and I've filed some form articles of incorporation for clients, it's an area of law that I know very little about. As such, I can't give very useful input regarding what type of entity we'd like to form. I will try to do a better job of keeping up with this discussion and chime in where I can, though.
|
|
|
Post by otatop on May 13, 2019 16:22:30 GMT
Seems like we could get away with just using LegalZoom or a similar service.
|
|
|
Post by catfacemeowmers on May 13, 2019 16:31:56 GMT
Seems like we could get away with just using LegalZoom or a similar service. Yeah incorporating should be very simple once the decisions are made, and pretty cheap. LegalZoom would be fine, or depending on the route we take I would be willing to prep the documents or assist in doing so. The tricky part is going to be deciding what goes in the bylaws, who the owners are, where to incorporate, what type of entity to form, etc.
|
|
|
Post by zikzak on May 13, 2019 17:10:47 GMT
If people are seriously afraid of 2+2 (lol), we could always organize as a foreign entity. gl to Mason filing nuisance suits against a co-op that's formed outside the US.
|
|
|
Post by catfacemeowmers on May 13, 2019 17:58:07 GMT
I don’t think anyone should be afraid of losing any suits against 2+2, but if an individual owns the new site they shouldn’t be footing the bill for legal fees to defend against nuisance suits. So I think it needs to be dealt with before the.
|
|
|
Post by microbet on May 13, 2019 20:35:33 GMT
If people are seriously afraid of 2+2 (lol), we could always organize as a foreign entity. gl to Mason filing nuisance suits against a co-op that's formed outside the US. Came here to post this. We'd need a non-American to head this up. Also, second that we don't need a lawyer to form a regular corporation, at least not in California, or even legal zoom. I've been part of forming three and it's not that big a deal. Keeping proper records and such is a PITA, but a lawyer (at least one outside the community) isn't going to be doing that for us. Idk if being a cooperative is anything special legally or just something that is in the by-laws.
|
|
|
Post by lapka on May 13, 2019 20:44:06 GMT
As far as I understood all that, you need articles of incorporation before bylaws. cultivate.coop/wiki/Articles_of_IncorporationArticles of Incorporation should include the following information:[1] Legal name of the cooperative: Be sure to use the exact legal name, rather than a “DBA” (“doing business as”) name. Check your Secretary of State’s online database to make sure the legal name you want to use is not already taken. Principle place of business: This is fairly self-explanatory. Use your cooperative’s primary business address. Purpose of the cooperative: This should be briefly and broadly defined, so as not to inhibit future development or expansion. Period of duration: In most cases, the period of duration will be “perpetual.” Name, number, and address of the registered agent or statutory agent (in some states, the names and contact information of the officers must also be included):[2] In most states, corporations must designate a registered agent or statutory agent. This individual must be available to receive official documents on behalf of the cooperative. The address provided cannot be a P.O. Box.[3] If a new registered agent is designated (or if new officers are elected, if applicable), the Articles of Incorporation must be updated and re-filed. Capital structure (stock or non-stock): This article should specify the number of shares authorized and the value of membership stock (and other types of stock, if applicable). Associated voting rights are detailed in the Bylaws, but may be referenced here.[4] What happens to the cooperative’s assets in the event of dissolution: In the event of dissolution, cooperatives often choose to distribute remaining assets to shareholders. Some cooperatives may distribute remaining assets to allied organizations.[5]
|
|
|
Post by Louis Cyphre on May 13, 2019 21:03:50 GMT
We have talked about the potential profits the site might make in the future. Quite frankly a community of a few hundred isn't going make any profits worth thinking about. At the of this forum there is an ad banner trying to sell ad-free premium accounts on this board. It costs $3/month. Think about the fact that this site would rather have $3 from their most-active customers than any ad revenue. We should be happy if whatever money the site can make is sufficient to cover operating costs. If there ever are any profits use them to pay back those that have generously pledged money to get the site off the ground. If the site should ever grow beyond being self-sustaining, let's revisit the issue. Until then it's as useful as discussing how we would spend a lottery jackpot.
|
|
|
Post by lapka on May 13, 2019 21:13:55 GMT
We have talked about the potential profits the site might make in the future. Quite frankly a community of a few hundred isn't going make any profits worth thinking about. At the of this forum there is an ad banner trying to sell ad-free premium accounts on this board. It costs $3/month. Think about the fact that this site would rather have $3 from their most-active customers than any ad revenue. We should be happy if whatever money the site can make is sufficient to cover operating costs. If there ever are any profits use them to pay back those that have generously pledged money to get the site off the ground. If the site should ever grow beyond being self-sustaining, let's revisit the issue. Until then it's as useful as discussing how we would spend a lottery jackpot. We don't discuss any revenue. What you said is completely true and no one doubts it.
Basically last status when I was still a part of the government was: We want to be a coop to mitigate legal risks and to give some decision power to the masses. A coop and not non-profit because a non-profit has to obey a lot of regulations.
Last of my problems that really did set me off was: Should I put out a poll with a question: "Coop or non-profit?" as a site wide poll or not? Internally everyone who participated agreed on coop.
Kerowo somehow didn't say his last word and tried not to say anything. Since no one said a word to that I decided that we won't put it yet out as a site wide poll and to try instead to bring together all things we need to incorporate a coop.
For now it looks like we need incorporation articles and bylaws. Also it seems now that it is decided to incorporate outside of USA.
|
|
|
Post by kerowo on May 13, 2019 21:20:23 GMT
I said we need a lawyer, I don’t care one way or the other what we incorporate as. I said we need a small group of people to be owners to get us started. No one bit and it’s back to rearranging the deck chairs.
|
|
|
Post by lapka on May 13, 2019 21:23:25 GMT
I have sent to you a PM asking you to put stickies on top of every forum, that we are looking for a lawbro as a support. You somehow neither said "no" no said "yes" to that, although I did ask you exactly because I found you idea with a lawyer very sensible. (Now probably not necessary any more since we have catface. But I am not in all that actually any more. And I think you are a grown-up dude and can decide yourself if you do it or not and if yes then with which exactly text).
And no one will bite. No one wants neither responsibility no invest time in that. Our best bet is coop and that we find ~10 people as founding members. For that we need to design it as unproblematic for this 10 people as possible.
|
|
|
Post by kerowo on May 13, 2019 21:53:25 GMT
One person asking for forum wide stickies isn’t a mod decision so I didn’t respond to it. I apologize for that.
|
|
|
Post by lapka on May 13, 2019 22:01:37 GMT
One person asking for forum wide stickies isn’t a mod decision so I didn’t respond to it. I apologize for that. Ok. Sorry. Didn't know. But I am anyway out of all that. I will continue to read and from time to time say sth. But I don't feel responsible any more.... so...
|
|